Oh yes, martial law! When I go for my run later I'll be sure to avoid the military patrols in my area. And later, when I go to the post office to renew my driving licence I'll make sure I have all my papers and some bribe money so I can get through the checkpoints that have been set up all around the town centre. And I'll be sure to keep an eye for any hegemony that might be lurking in the shadows. Crikey, is that a tank driving up my street???
Martial law involves...
“suspension of civil law by a government, especially in response to a temporary emergency.”
Where that suspension is supported by the military—albeit tacitly as it is in the UK—you (quite explicitly) have martial law. I’m not alone in maintaining this position.
Obviously, most states that exercise martial law are loathed to concede that’s what’s occurring: how then to criticise other nations who don’t share your ideals? And such an open concession would compromise what’s needed most by most governments: blind support from the subjective perspectives the state itself nurtures (ie a civic-minded sense of self similar to yours).
Given I maintain a flicker of hope for your generic Western mind, it might be worth highlighting that some parts of the UK had the martial law, of the highly visible variety you refer to, as recently as the 1990s. The notion and the principle is scarcely ‘out there’.
And some of the administration responsible continue to constitute the British government today. They wouldn’t hesitate to deploy troops to enforce the lockdown should it be required. Make no mistake. In your current condition, you would doubtless support this and (under the auspices of the BBC) continue to deny its martial status.
But Hovis? He’s in La La Land right? It could never happen.
‘You are sleeping. You do not want to believe. You are sleeping. You do not want to believe’.