The seller has proven reliable to me in the past, but as you say, it's a lot to consider without more detailed photos/information. I suppose the answer would lie in dissecting the process of pressing vinyl, step by step, and see if the error is feasible. As far as 'promo' goes, perhaps it was...
Seems to be the case, unless it's somehow feasible that the true TP indeed could have had the same full matrix# as the promos. Otherwise it leaves a bad taste to merely be sold on label color.
I'm intrigued at the thought of another test pressing for the revised version as well.
Is there nomenclature available as to what each number/letter beyond the revision for A or B side really means? I have never really delved into that, shamefully. Perhaps that is where the certainty lies...
I'm envisioning this whole ordeal being merged with the idea that collectors are now putting their off-white promos in the sunlight for an extended period of time. :lbf:
So what's to say this isn't a promo (as the promos are documented to all have the rejected B1 cut) aside from the fact the label isn't pink? Is it known that all 12" promo labels of Ask were pink? If no one has a white label promo of this then I suppose there is some provenance.
Are you still yammering on about that? I don't maintain the market value on those items isn't affected; I just said the evidence isn't completely irrefutable at this point. Ergo, your cash offer is kindly accepted. :)
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.