I think in this context that is semantics since we are really mocking the person who decided to post this rather than the person who pressed the button.
Although I suppose it is true that it's possible he's just being sneaky, and that he does suggest things which then get posted on there.
M came across very well anyway, and the assassination bit is one of the great Morrissey interview moments I think. The host was a bit over the top but the questions were generally good.
Interesting that he is saying SHE (Miley?) doesn't want the backing vocals on there. Or is the 'she' her manager? Because that does seem different to what he was saying in the emails.
I think it is perhaps a good sign that he is resigned to Miley not changing her mind anyway, maybe that means...
I have no idea how relevant any of this is, but something I found interesting.
On roughly the 22nd of December last year Morrissey's official YouTube page name was changed to Leif Janzen, someone who works in marketing at Capitol. On the 19th of December last year he posted a picture of...
You may be right actually, that would make sense. It did seem initially that Veronica was the obvious first single too, but they had to change it due to the Miley thing.
Still not seen any real info on why RWA had so little publicity though. If M was still in a grump after the change of plans...
When did Moz say Veronica would be the first single? I can't recall that.
And just to be clear, what you are saying about RWA is based on the assumption that Morrissey would not have agree to switching the single and would not have agreed to that level of promotion? And obviously we know...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.