Official Facebook 2 Israel dates - tickets available now (May 9 & 11, 2020)

full



(First link is dead currently).

Venues:
Zappa Amphi Shuni, Binyamina (May 9)
Pavilion 1 - EXPO, Tel Aviv (May 11)

(Please note: there is a date discrepancy between the FB post's date and the venue's - the gig cited as on the 10th is listed as being on the 11th via the venue).

Regards,
FWD.

Update:
A working link for tickets on the 9th:


Media item:
 
Last edited by a moderator:

A Man Escaped

Well-Known Member
You sound retarded. First you imply Jews are a special group because of "centuries of discrimination" by who and WHY? Also you reference the supposed Holocaust where 6 trillion Jews died? so now nobody is allowed to mock their culture? Irish were oppressed hundreds of years yet we can make them look like little trolls called leprechauns and call them drunks

What political ideology is doing this? Are they advocating the extermination of the Irish or denying their history?

But most importantly , you're actually advocating real world violence at Morrissey concerts yet have the nerve to feing being concerned about a Jew joke.


If you'd read my post correctly thicko, my comments were a direct response to Pippistrella's hope that there would be violence at the Morrissey concert. If she's going to dish it out, let her take it on the chin. I am a feminist!
 
"During the Industrial Revolution the majority of the English lived in crowded squalor and were literally worked like slaves to the death in toxic factories. In parts of Manchester the average age of death was 17. They were also sent to war after war where it was virtually certain they would die a horrendously violent death. Rarely do you ever hear the English cite any of this to gain victim identity points."

What a daft comparison. Were the people who worked like slaves or fought in wars chosen because of their race or religion?

Is that really why they were "chosen"? Nothing to do with the usary, social subversion, refusal to assimilate in the various cultures they infiltrated throughout history, none of that was a factor? Nope, they were just magically hated by over 100 different countries for no reason. Something's rotten in Denmark here
 


If you'd read my post correctly thicko, my comments were a direct response to Pippistrella's hope that there would be violence at the Morrissey concert. If she's going to dish it out, let her take it on the chin. I am a feminist!

Well I'm not a feminist and I'm not down with violence, especially to women
 

Pippistrella

On Timeout
If you weren't the ignorant racist you so clearly are you'd realise that:
Many groups, mainly political parties , mainly in Northern Ireland have organised much of their existence around their history, the English occupation, the Great Famine etc. Many of them do so for political gain. Are you completely ignorant of the last century of Irish history and the troubles?
People did indeed live horrible, squalid lives in the eighteenth, nineteenth, and twentieth centuries, in Manchester and in many other places. They were not put there because of their race, skin colour, or religious preferences. They were there because they were born into poverty and for most them escaping that poverty was impossible. So your point is as irrelevant as it is stupid.
The Jews run the media and the banks do they? My, what an imaginative observation. You need to stop watching shit on Youtube, stop being a miserable little racist, and most importantly of all, stop being a stupid little waste of space.
On the contrary I am well versed in Irish history and the Troubles. The IRA very rarely if ever cited the Great Hunger to gain victim points. But history is now being re-written - not least by people like yourself. Sinn Fein for example which was the political wing of the Provos is nowadays unrecognizable to its former rebel self and is busily rewriting the history of the Troubles and why they happened.

Despite how this may sting, certain groups aim for victim status over others for reasons that are far from honorable.

There is one group that is more guilty of this than any other. Which is why their particular victim story is promoted in schools over any other, and to question the details and their veracity is uniquely illegal in most European countries. Which is a crime against free speech and intellectual inquiry.
 

Ketamine Sun

<><><><><><><><><><>
Yes, me too. At the very least, I hope he doesn't shake anyone's hand or hug any stage invaders.

Yeah he might not. I’d be more worried traveling and going through all those various airport terminals. It wouldn’t be a bad idea to cancel.
 

Radis Noir

Well-Known Member
There is a school of thought that says feminism actually causes violence against women.
Which 'school of thought' is that please? Or is your 'school of thought' actually just some angry little incel who posts videos on Youtube filmed in his mum's back bedroom?
 

Pippistrella

On Timeout
Oh here we go! Lets just stop.
I'm being serious - it's an interesting observation that caught my attention somewhere.

For example, feminists hate 'toxic masculinity' yet some of them favour porn - which violently degrades women. They also favour black rap which blatantly glorifies the denigrating of women. It's as if because feminists have locked themselves into a theory of despising 'masculinity' that they are innately drawn towards 'alternatives' of masculine violence and indeed promote it (which in itself perpetuates and even encourages more violence upon women).

I read about this theory once and found it thought provoking. For example, look at how many 'woke' or 'left' women are now choosing black partners - when it is an uncomfortable but statistical fact that a black partner is seven times more likely to kill you than a white partner - not least because of holding an old-fashioned attitude of ultra-masculinity (the kind that rap espouses and liberals are strangely supportive of - but only if it's black). It's the same way that someone with an alcoholic parent is likely to choose a similarly abusive partner.

If yin and yang decrees that women need men and vice versa, then if this need is consciously denied the results will inevitably be toxic.

Not saying I agree, just that it's an interesting psychological theory.
 
Last edited:

Pippistrella

On Timeout
Wasn't talking to you asswipe. And stop misrepresenting my comments. They were specifically in reference to Pippistrella hoping for violence at the Morrissey gig.
If you can't read that my post about fights at Leeds was a 'spirited' rather than serious post, then I can only surmise you are as autistic as Greta Thunberg.
 

Pippistrella

On Timeout
Which 'school of thought' is that please? Or is your 'school of thought' actually just some angry little incel who posts videos on Youtube filmed in his mum's back bedroom?
No it was an academic treatise. I wish I could remember the author so I could link it.

Basically its message was that if you're going to artificially suppress something (like a natural urge) then it's going to come out somewhere - and perhaps not in a favourable way.

Feminism (and woke in general) imposes a lot of rules, which become repressive chains, which can cause many problems.
 
Last edited:

A Man Escaped

Well-Known Member
If you can't read that my post about fights at Leeds was a 'spirited' rather than serious post, then I can only surmise that you are as autistic as Greta Thunberg.

My comments were equally "spirited". Something clearly lost on your pal. I suspect the above post was a means to a end, namely the belittling of Greta Thunberg, who has Asperger's. Nice.
 

A Man Escaped

Well-Known Member
Feminism is nonsense. It's entire purpose is to divide men and woman and destroy the family unit. It's done a pretty good job at it too


Yes. Back in the good old days, when women married who they were told to, had more kids than she really wanted as result of the sexual desires of her husband, no financial independence, beaten black and blue and the neighbours did nothing, it was nonstop shits and giggles.
 

Pippistrella

On Timeout
Feminism is nonsense. It's entire purpose is to divide men and woman and destroy the family unit. It's done a pretty good job at it too
Yes, it was used by capitalists to double the number of the work force, thus lowering wages. For example, any working class man of the old days could work and support his wife and family. Now that notion is almost laughable - he wouldn't be able to keep them in bread and water.

And of course the Cultural Marxists originated from the Frankfurt School intellectuals used (and still use) feminism to destroy the notion of 'the family' to undermine and enslave societies. The ending of the taboo about single parenting has been a semi-acknowledged disaster. The idea of the single mum as 'strong independent hero' was encouraged for years, and sometimes still is, but at the same time 'the single mum' is also thought of and treated (when the media and academia feel like it) as a poor victim who has it so hard. Most boys in gangs and most of the prison population are products of single parenting - but we're not supposed to acknowledge that of course.
 
Last edited:
Yes. Back in the good old days, when women married who they were told to, had more kids than she really wanted as result of the sexual desires of her husband, no financial independence, beaten black and blue and the neighbours did nothing, it was nonstop shits and giggles.

Sounds like you had a shitty Father. However the doesn't really match reality of most moral people in the past or present. Now instead of serving her family , feminism made it so a woman can leave her family to serve a strange man at her workplace instead.
 

Trending Threads

Top Bottom