D
Deleted member 28251
Guest
I was just thinking that.You're welcome. Perhaps you could use it as a model of how to write a comment that actually conveys meaning, rather than the logorrhoeic stream you usually visit on here?
I was just thinking that.You're welcome. Perhaps you could use it as a model of how to write a comment that actually conveys meaning, rather than the logorrhoeic stream you usually visit on here?
I doubt it.I was just thinking that.
Thanks for sharing.As Hovis pontificates on the human condition, it seems too appropriate to underline just how depressing it is that both he the fat bloated alcoholic failed comedian have to concoct these fantasies in order to cope with whatever my mere existence provokes within them.
In Hovis' case, it's this compulsion to paint me as a telly-watching agent of the hegemony simply because I've been a rather vocal opponent of the baffling racism on this forum. He needs me to occupy this philosophical space as some sort of woke neoliberal because doing so casts his own lukewarm politics into a vivid three-dimensionality of rarified "intellectual honesty." Naturally, he says these things in the same breath while accusing others of only perceiving the binary. Adorable.
The fat bloated alcoholic failed comedian has a diagnosis that falls more in line with reelfountain: a desperate hunger for exceptionalism. It's a boringly common phenomenon; I've noticed most hardcore racists exhibit strong narcissistic traits. The self-centered paranoia clearly culminates here with the absurd accusation that I'm harassing this person on social media, reading their "articles" and plagiarizing their terminology. He ties this tragic delusion up in a pretty little bow by concluding that this must be on account of how fascinating and intelligent he is. I suppose we'll have to take his word for that one, it's certainly not something anyone has ever observed.
You're a bit repetitive but I must say that the new posting style is a great improvement on what came before.Thanks for sharing.
Thanks.You're a bit repetitive but I must say that the new posting style is a great improvement on what came before.
As Hovis pontificates on the human condition, it seems too appropriate to underline just how depressing it is that both he the fat bloated alcoholic failed comedian have to concoct these fantasies in order to cope with whatever my mere existence provokes within them.
In Hovis' case, it's this compulsion to paint me as a telly-watching agent of the hegemony simply because I've been a rather vocal opponent of the baffling racism on this forum. He needs me to occupy this philosophical space as some sort of woke neoliberal because doing so casts his own lukewarm politics into a vivid three-dimensionality of rarified "intellectual honesty." Naturally, he says these things in the same breath while accusing others of only perceiving the binary. Adorable.
The fat bloated alcoholic failed comedian has a diagnosis that falls more in line with reelfountain: a desperate hunger for exceptionalism. It's a boringly common phenomenon; I've noticed most hardcore racists exhibit strong narcissistic traits. The self-centered paranoia clearly culminates here with the absurd accusation that I'm harassing this person on social media, reading their "articles" and plagiarizing their terminology. He ties this tragic delusion up in a pretty little bow by concluding that this must be on account of how fascinating and intelligent he is. I suppose we'll have to take his word for that one, it's certainly not something anyone has ever observed.
But that’s your way.
I guess whilst I would wish Reel to think differently, I might begin by recognising her concerns which actually relate to the individual’s relationship with the state. This is something which transcends any differences, for me.
I guess the question is, do you want an engagement or do you want to talk about how right you are, and how wrong others are? Neither is correct or in error (I don’t think) but the outcomes are different: “it’s up to you”.
What is ‘psy-ops’? Someone’s been asking.I have acknowledged anything that I can see her point on. But it's hard to lightly skip past endless posts saying black people are innately violent & Jewish people are running psy-ops.
& she was quite happy laying into me for being 'woke' or whatever.
What is ‘psy-ops’? Someone’s been asking.
Ah, OK. That’s what I guessed. I think the Mesopotamians invented that.Psychological operations - it's the idea that everything in the media is psychological warfare. In her case she believes it's created by Jewish people to undermine & destroy the white race.
As Hovis pontificates on the human condition, it seems too appropriate to underline just how depressing it is that both he the fat bloated alcoholic failed comedian have to concoct these fantasies in order to cope with whatever my mere existence provokes within them.
In Hovis' case, it's this compulsion to paint me as a telly-watching agent of the hegemony simply because I've been a rather vocal opponent of the baffling racism on this forum. He needs me to occupy this philosophical space as some sort of woke neoliberal because doing so casts his own lukewarm politics into a vivid three-dimensionality of rarified "intellectual honesty." Naturally, he says these things in the same breath while accusing others of only perceiving the binary. Adorable.
The fat bloated alcoholic failed comedian has a diagnosis that falls more in line with reelfountain: a desperate hunger for exceptionalism. It's a boringly common phenomenon; I've noticed most hardcore racists exhibit strong narcissistic traits. The self-centered paranoia clearly culminates here with the absurd accusation that I'm harassing this person on social media, reading their "articles" and plagiarizing their terminology. He ties this tragic delusion up in a pretty little bow by concluding that this must be on account of how fascinating and intelligent he is. I suppose we'll have to take his word for that one, it's certainly not something anyone has ever observed.
Is the little guy who has me "permanently blocked" replying to my posts again?
I'm sorry, but this would be a more convincing stance if you hadn't spent the afternoon making numerous lengthy and delusional posts about me.Shut up, loser. If you haven’t noticed, no one here likes you. Go stalk my Twitter feed if you need something to do. You probably already have it open on another browser tab.
Is the little guy who has me "permanently blocked" replying to my posts again?
Are you referring to the multi-page nervous breakdown you had sometime last year after I posted a handful of tour stories? That neurotic deluge of posts you made where you frantically tried to convince yourself that I was lying? Is that the one you're talking about?Hey, Verso, do you remember that time you made a fool of yourself by pretending to be a secret rock star and no one believed you?
Could you do that again? I had a rough day and could use a good laugh. Tell us about the time you headlined Glastonbury.
Are you referring to the multi-page nervous breakdown you had sometime last year after I posted a handful of tour stories? That neurotic deluge of posts you made where you frantically tried to convince yourself that I was lying? Is that the one you're talking about?