M
MozTrash
Guest
Aprende ingles, inutil. Argentina el del mundo.APRENDE A ESCRIBIR INFELIZ
Aprende ingles, inutil. Argentina el del mundo.APRENDE A ESCRIBIR INFELIZ
Can YOU do the"List of the Merch " please?(Oh, PS, I got about 50 in that particular list...)
Here’s one for you cro..
dont forget to make songs about Moz's cut of concessions
Moz routed the trolls
Final solution
yeah Hugh you got it nailed down for sure
guardian begs for quids the moment you click one
one of their moronic articles, they are the
of the media industry
For this alone.
now the trolls, under the command of Comrade McMuffin and Hugh want to apply "the Final Solution" to decent, good upper echelon fans.
Make us into MeatPuppet McMuffins
they have no box set no japanese rarities, no vegas 45 and vegas swag, no show attendance and want to off all those that do.
but we have the Moz resistance going against their nazi ways
(Fredo the robocop soon to attach his usual commentary)
Maybe you should focus a wee bit more on actually reading...are you implying im wrong about music sucking?
5 minutes after posting that opinions cant be wrong?
caterwauling sucking is a fact, which according to
your lemma makes it twice as right.
ignore BGV chiming in, he lacks scientific knowledge
Maybe you should focus a wee bit more on actually reading...
Congratulations, once again you have demonstrated your ability to use a lot of words to actually say very little.Wrong again. What you actually said is not disputable - it's there in black and white and I quoted it.
The problem for you is that what you actually said doesn't mean what you thought it meant (as I demonstrated above), and you think that people should draw an inference based on what you really meant to say, rather than what you actually said. The context is irrelevant.
"Implying that a persons... opinions are wrong is f***ing stupid beyond belief" is what you said. That's a complete statement, which necessarily implies that opinions can't be wrong, because otherwise why would it be "f***ing stupid beyond belief" to imply that they can be?
Of course, your statement made no actual sense, since clearly opinions can be wrong, so there's no reason to assert that it's "f***ing stupid beyond belief" to imply that someone's opinions can be wrong.
The context - a discussion of Johnny Marr's songs - doesn't make your claim any more logical or sensible: taking into account the context, your claim is still illogical nonsense - to still be rabbiting on about how context can make it right is f***ing stupid beyond belief.
The “ Wider public”
everyone seems able to make out your posts except yourself
when your lemma hits a brick wall
you need to back up FFS
look what happened when rat said fwd=skinny
he was called a nutter but now he claims he was winding
so is he sane or insane now? or is fwd=skinny now true
when it was insanity just yesterday
peeps keep your lemmas straight
Congratulations, once again you have demonstrated your ability to use a lot of words to actually say very little.
Your “Wider public “
well, you do seem to be on the same wavelength as fredo the robocop
needless to say not a good thing, much like going nazi hunting with hitler