YOUR VACCINATION: - MESSAGES FROM MORRISSEY - MORRISSEY CENTRAL - YOUR VACCINATION:
MESSAGES FROM MORRISSEY on MORRISSEY CENTRAL
www.morrisseycentral.com
Regards,
FWD.
Wow... you still believe this myth?? Believe Moz. In the end he is always right, and you know it. All data show vaccines don't work and we don't need to wait much longer to see they have a negative effect. Wake up please...Sorry Moz. This is the last straw. I’ve loved you for so long. Vaccines save lives. They were not tested on animals. You feeble-minded man. I used to love you.
Wow... you still believe this myth?? Believe Moz. In the end he is always right, and you know it. All data show vaccines don't work and we don't need to wait much longer to see they have a negative effect. Wake up please...
Fox News is Melvis’ go-to for local and national affairs! He and the Orange Clown have more in common than you think.
Not for the first time in history, Woke is simply people recognising that if (through duress, and the punishment of shame) you can get people to associate virtue with hatred and breakdown, you can f*** up an awful lot of civilization, sit back, and enjoy watching it burn.Both videos are fairly innocuous. One is about the US National Institutes of Health being involved in animal experimentation generally (like all governments, no doubt), and not related specifically to the development of any current covid vaccine; the other is basically saying vaccines are fine, just don't make them mandatory and force people to take them. Very reasonable, even if he could do with a haircut. If you're looking for an anti-vax message then you won't find any. No need for the habitual frothing at the mouth from the usual suspects...
Talking of which...Julie Burchill had a great article at the weekend on 'Woke'. Really exposes that mindset for the bull shit it is:
Woke is roar of smug, entitled mediocrities everywhere: JULIE BURCHILL
JULIE BURCHILL: Why, even during the greatest threat to the human race in living memory, were the Woke still such nitpicking naysayers?www.dailymail.co.uk
Whatever your opinion of the contributors, those were two interesting videos. Moreover, they represent the views and conclusions of most left leaning people in the UK: The first exposes animal cruelty occurring for the sole purpose of receiving funding (and from taxes, earmarked for ‘essential’ public services and security programmes). The second video represents the sanctity of human free will, and control over one’s own body especially; the very essence of human rights.
I can only assume ‘left’ is coming to mean something completely different elsewhere, because if you contest this content I’d say you were a conservative—or something much, much darker (you’d probably need to join or establish The Evil Party if you’re opposed). And God knows what it was you ever saw in Morrissey or The Smiths.
Both videos are fairly innocuous. One is about the US National Institutes of Health being involved in animal experimentation generally (like all governments, no doubt), and not related specifically to the development of any current covid vaccine; the other is basically saying vaccines are fine, just don't make them mandatory and force people to take them. Very reasonable, even if he could do with a haircut. If you're looking for an anti-vax message then you won't find any. No need for the habitual frothing at the mouth from the usual suspects...
Talking of which...Julie Burchill had a great article at the weekend on 'Woke'. Really exposes that mindset for the bull shit it is:
Woke is roar of smug, entitled mediocrities everywhere: JULIE BURCHILL
JULIE BURCHILL: Why, even during the greatest threat to the human race in living memory, were the Woke still such nitpicking naysayers?www.dailymail.co.uk
They're both talking points being pushed by the far right this week - & here you are to chat about it.
I'm wondering, did Sam get recruited or does someone send him this stuff & he doesn't quite get it?
Whilst I recognise Sam has (perhaps unwisely) been let loose with the Central website, I’m not sure it’s ever contradicted Morrissey’s perspectives.They're both talking points being pushed by the far right this week - & here you are to chat about it.
I'm wondering, did Sam get recruited or does someone send him this stuff & he doesn't quite get it?
Gary glitter might have made good music but I don’t care to find out due to his reprehensible actions. Credibility matters (especially in news) and tucker is a pretty terrible person. Being judged on what you say and do and how that effects the way in which you are perceived and who your listeners are isn’t a new concept. This news was covered everywhere and could have been posted from any source but I doubt it was the info that mattered here. If someone wanted to get into glam I wouldn’t recommend glitter but rather another quality source because who wants to promote evil people rather than better ones. Just because someone says something true once in a blue moon doesn’t mean I’m gonna disregard the past and watch that. Each time you watch you support the process
Whilst I recognise Sam has (perhaps unwisely) been let loose with the Central website, I’m not sure it’s ever contradicted Morrissey’s perspectives.
If you’re suggesting that some unsavoury characters are now propagating these popular (and traditionally left-wing) agendas, then I’d say it’s Labour in the UK and the Democrats in the US who are now gifting opportunities to their own opposition. If the latter can’t accept some responsibility for that, then further electoral defeats are inevitable—and you’d have to say it’s deserved.
Whilst I recognise Sam has (perhaps unwisely) been let loose with the Central website, I’m not sure it’s ever contradicted Morrissey’s perspectives.
If you’re suggesting that some unsavoury characters are now propagating these popular (and traditionally left-wing) agendas, then I’d say it’s Labour in the UK and the Democrats in the US who are now gifting opportunities to their own opposition. If the latter can’t accept some responsibility for that, then further electoral defeats are inevitable—and you’d have to say it’s deserved.
The site is a commercial liability.I personally think Sam is a real problem, look at the debate that the videos have prompted amongst the posters on here, how many people outside of this forum will look at the central post without watching the videos and jump to conclusions about Morrissey's viewing habits. I would have thought Morrissey's new management team would have told him to stop posting shit on there unless cleared by them first.
Goodness me Moz is now pushing vids of Tucker Carlson's rants on his audience??! This might be the point where I say "bye bye"
Two questions.
What video source would you have preferred that he used when this Central post was made?
Cosby Spector Glitter all were sentenced and/or punished for their crime. Why should people punish themselves by not enjoying the good that these artists contributed to this world?
Of course it’s your choice, but I also feel it is your loss.
Yes. If you were to pursue that stance with rigour, you’d have an incredibly limited (and arguably shite) set of artistic resources to draw/learn from.Two questions.
What video source would you have preferred that he used when this Central post was made?
Cosby Spector Glitter all were sentenced and/or punished for their crime. Why should people punish themselves by not enjoying the good that these artists contributed to this world?
Of course it’s your choice, but I also feel it is your loss.
Well by ‘vids’ that would mean that he’s posted other Tucker videos.
If he continued to post FOX news
propaganda that didn’t have anything to do with Morrissey’s main concern animal rights, then I can see why people would be turned off.
Otherwise, people, as usual, are getting their knickers in a twist.
But one of those contributors is a long standing resource for Central, and he strikes me (quite clearly) as an authentic liberal—as opposed to ‘far right’.No - Ket. Something has to be done.
Sam or the person feeding him this stuff f***ed up badly.
PETA, Mandate, quick move to a song - that's intentional.
Maybe Alain can try diplomatically mentioning it - they've already separated Morrissey from the Smiths, it'll be his work that's taboo for a couple of generations after Moz is dead. If this continues.
The site is a commercial liability.