D
Deleted member 1074
Guest
Why is this on-topic but Johnny being gay is off-topic?
Probably
Johnny recently came out as straight. I'd never heard that from him previously, but it's here:
Have you actually seen a picture of Tina?You do have to take into account the type of woman Tina was. I mean this as respectfully as I can, but Tina did look quite mannish or at the very least boyish. It wasn't as though Moz had hooked up with some broad with big boobies and child bearing hips. My best guess and like everyone else it's only a guess, is that he is a homosexual but should he end up with a woman this is the type of woman (looks wise) I'd expect him to be with.
Have you actually seen a picture of Tina?
I always thought she existed but only in Morrissey's mind.
Have you actually seen a picture of Tina?
I always thought she existed but only in Morrissey's mind.
Have you actually seen a picture of Tina?
I always thought she existed but only in Morrissey's mind.
Wait a minute. You're going along with the idea that humasexuals are a thing that exist and you've studied their sex drives? Who were your subjects?it's either the life force or the death force that people are tending to. in some it ends up being a lifelong conflict between the two. when you lack a strong sexual desire, you cannot really participate fully in life, you feel most likely alienated from how other people live their lives. in people tending more to the death force with a smaller amount of sex drive hormones, attraction or even desire has to be built up over a longer stretch of time, sometimes years, as the prospect of entering a warm pussy and grabbing some boobs or dicks, is not enough to trigger erotic feelings of any sort. evolution defo favours those who can trigger such desperate longings quickly and build their lives around the goal of fullfilling them, so that group has ended up being the life-affirming, sex- and procreation focussed majority with all their petty problems evolving as consequences of their sexuality. after the kids have arrived, the homely nest becomes the center of attention, in which the sexual desire turns into a protective or possessive carpet of belonging. it is all part of a biological programme, that has been crystallizing during thousands of years of evolution.
those tending to the death force logically havent procreated that much, as it all takes much longer and involves the ability to cultivate the seeds of life and love over a longer period of time which has become even more difficult in our fast-paced societies.
i would say that humasexuals belong to the second category. i assume that their reduced sex drive makes them focus not so much on need-driven copulation with the high risk of accidental procreation, but rather the enterprise of encountering another person first. but as those people are all more or less belonging to the first category, and their numbers are growing exponentially, it will be difficult for humasexuals to find romantic partners in general. so maybe they have to stick to those sympathetic and/or interesting few, that are on the same wavelength, whatever their biological equipment.
Everybody was bisexual in 1973.This is like when Elton John claimed to be bisexual.
View attachment 52536
Everybody was bisexual in 1973.
There was no Internet so it took longer for trends to die.This was 1976.
Have you actually seen a picture of Tina?
I always thought she existed but only in Morrissey's mind.
Have you actually seen a picture of Tina?
I always thought she existed but only in Morrissey's mind.
I've been an avid Morrissey admirer for a decade and a half now. I've seen him live dozens of times and have read everything, so quite naturally I have my opinions and fancies of his inner workings. I accept that I may be off the mark - it's possible at least - but then again it's likely that my calculated assumptions just may be adroitly precise. I've spent a lot of time musing on these things so I'd strongly put my money on the latter.That's because you know hardly anything about Morrissey and you come up with your own fantasies about what he thinks and believes which you post to this website and almost always miss the mark on it.
It's fan fiction and most of what you write about Morrissey wouldn't look out of place on the Blue Rose Society website. He's not communicating secretly with any of us.
He's a 60 year old millionaire, he's not an asexual and no he doesn't claim to be in relationships with imaginary women --- he's not Urbanus.
We've all seen pictures of Tina. Ignore the inconvenient fact that Tina exists so you can continue believing you have a unique insight into the inner workings of Morrissey's brain. Then you can create more essay length expositions on what you imagine are Morrissey's romantic and nostalgic longings despite the the fact that you're about 25 years too late with all of this.