You are criticising the arts. He has earned his money by working.
He doesn't have to - it gives her name more traction & it would make no difference. It's been a choice to hype up his 'controversial' statements & bury everything else.
He's better off just finding something else for people to be annoyed about.
Again, he has not "earned his money by working". Certainly, he's accumulated millions that have been paid to him, but he has not "earned" those millions. I already responded to this point earlier, though, and you still have no substantive response to it (except to say you're personally offended) so I'll leave that with you.
Be as artistic as you like - I don't mind. Really, it's completely fine with me. If you can make a living from it and you enjoy it, that's even better.
You're right, though, Morrissey doesn't
have to say explicitly that he's no longer a fan of For Britain and its policies. He doesn't
have to publicly urge people to not "give them a chance", but since he doesn't say he doesn't support them anymore, there is no basis at all for you to claim that he doesn't support them.
Over the decades, there are very many issues and people about whom Morrissey has expressed opinions and then not mentioned them again. I don't think he's mentioned, say, Margaret Thatcher or Myra Hindley or even Barack Obama in a quite a while. If your argument held up, we would have to deduce from his silence that his opinions about them have changed - not just his opinions about For Britain. Suddenly, and without explanation, he likes Thatcher, Hindley and Obama now; he can't get enough of those milk-snatching, child-murdering non-black black people.
Can you see yet what's wrong with your argument?
The fact that he hasn't talked about For Britain recently cannot be construed as his having rejected them or their ideas. It's wishful thinking on your part, and on your part alone.